科学发展是"配对"式,不是"移植"式:      西方科学是初级科学,因为它没有整体理论:
科学的创新和再生是有规律可循的,它和生物的繁殖与再生规律相同。人类的繁殖需要男人和女人,植物的杂交需要父本和母本 ,缺一不可。科学的发展也一样,必须具有两种互补功能的科学结合在一起才能生出新的科学来。东方科学和西方科学就是这样天生的一对。但是,当今世界有一种潮流,只承认西方科学,不承认东方科学。"因特网"上不断出现否认东方科学的文章,如"东方思维拯救现代科学的悖论"、"东方文明的红旗能打多久"等。这种"同性恋"式的思维方法严重阻碍科学的进步,东方科学和西方科学在教育、科研等所有领域都应处于同等重要的地位。仅懂西方科学不懂东方科学的人只能算是半个科学家,现代科学也仅是科学领域中的"半边天"。中国的政治家有大智慧,能把中西政治理论结合产生出新的理论,可是,现代世界上的大多科学工作者受教条主义束缚,不会把不同类别的科学结合在一起发展新科学,而是都聚在现代科学的一棵树上吊死。如今,国际上普遍承认政治的多元化,只有科技领域仍固步自封,还保持一元化的思维逻辑辑。

[2005-09-30]

西方科学,由于发展历史短,它仅能研究局部和微观现象。按照认识论的标准,它是处于认识的初级阶段,它不能认识事物的整体。"15世纪下半叶,近代科学开始兴起,力学、天文学、物理学、化学、生物学等科目逐渐从混为一体的哲学中分离出来,获得日益迅速的发展。近代自然科学发展了研究自然界的独特的分析方法,包括实验、解剖和观察,把自然界的细节从总的自然联系中抽出来,分门别类地加以研究。这种考察自然界的方法移植到哲学中,就成为行而上学的思维。行而上学的出现是有历史根据的,是时代的需要,因为在深入的、细节的考察方面它比古代哲学是一个进步。但是,形而上学撇开总体的联系考察事物和过程,因而它就'以这些障碍堵塞了自己从了解部分到了解整体、到洞察普遍联系的道路' (恩格斯,《马克思恩格斯选集》,第三卷,第468页)。"(钱学森:论人体科学与现代科技.上海交通大学出版社,1998,第290页)。上面这段话就证明西方科学中没有整体科学。
    由于历史的悠久,整体科学在中国古代早已成熟。
《系辞》中说,《易经》"范围天地之化而不为过,曲成万物而不遗。"在宇宙中存在的天地万物生成变化都在《易经》所包含的架构模式中,"在天成象,在地成形,变化见矣。"天地万物之所以如此存在,都可以在《易经》中找到其所以存在的道理。因此,"易与天地准,故能弥纶天地之道。"《易经》所表现的宇宙构架模式可以成为实际存在的天地万物相应的准则。《易经·系传》中说"开物成务,冒天下之道","以通天下之志,以定天下之业,以断天下之疑"。因此,整体科学应该用《易经》的构架模式为指导思想。[2005-12-30]

· Scientific development is the "matching" type, not "transplanted" Type : · Western science is the primary science because it has no overall theory :
Scientific innovation and Laws may be renewable, and its biological breeding and regeneration of the same. Human reproduction needs men and women need male parent plant and plant hybrid mother, and neither is dispensable. The development of science, science must have two complementary functions can be combined to generate new scientific. Oriental science and Western science is so born one. However, there is a trend of today's world, only recognizing western science, science does not recognize the East. "Internet" emerging scientific articles denying the East, such as "Save the East thinking of the paradox of modern science", "Oriental civilization hoisted how long do over the ground." This "gay" - style way of thinking seriously hamper scientific progress, the East and the West science in science education, scientific research in all fields should be equally important status. Not only understand Western science is only half the Oriental science scientists, modern science is the only field of science, "Women." Chinese politicians have a great wisdom, can have a combination of Chinese and Western political theory, a new theory, but most of the modern world, scientific workers affected by the shackles of dogmatism, not to a combination of different types of scientific development of new science, but modern science is brought in hanging on a tree. Today, the international community generally acknowledged political pluralism, only the field of science and technology still stands still remained a unitary logic series.

[2005-09-30]

Western science, with short development history, it can research local and micro phenomenon. In accordance with the standard theory of knowledge, which is in the initial stages of awareness, it can not understand things as a whole. " 15 the second half of last century, the beginning of the rise of modern science, mechanics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology and other subjects gradually from the philosophy intermixed separated, was increasingly rapid development. Modern science has developed a unique research methodology for the analysis of the natural world, including experiments, observation and analysis, the nature of the details drawn from the overall natural link to be disaggregated research. This study replicated in the natural world means philosophy, and became the school's thinking. OK, there is a school based on the history, the needs of the times, because in-depth, detailed study of ancient philosophy than it is a step forward. However, the metaphysical link from the overall inspection process and things, and thus it 'to plug these obstacles from understanding its part to understand the whole, to see the universal link road' (Engels, "Marx and Engels anthology," Volume III, p. 468). "(Qian Xuesen : The theory of human science and modern technology. Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 1998, 290 pages). Western science to prove that the above paragraph is not the overall science.
As long history, the overall science in ancient China already mature.
"functioning" that the "Book of Changes", "scope of the world to live without, a world without war song. "In the universe there are changes in the world and all creation contained in the" Book of Changes "framework," as in Tiancheng, to shape, change See full. "The reason why the existence of Gods creation, can be found in the "Book of Changes," the reason why it exists. Therefore, the "Yi associate with the world, and it could be reconciled lun vista of the Road. "" The Book of Changes, "which can be a model framework for the performance of the universe real world things corresponding guidelines. "Book of Changes is passed," said "the objects into works that run the world's Road," and "to the world at all - to be the world's industry, to cut the world's suspected." Therefore, the overall scientific framework should use the "Book of Changes" model for guiding ideology. [2005-12-30]